Depending on your particular environment, database reporting can have a heavy impact on the database performance, can execute queries which run for dozens of minutes or both. This is usually the case with reports which require complex queries having multiple calls to SQL Server’s aggregate functions to be executed against very large data sets. The effect on the database performance is particularly severe in scenarios where the production database stores data which is changed often – as data modification operations require exclusive locks, in order to preserve the integrity of the database, SQL Server will go ahead with the data modification operation until the query initiated by the report is still running. This increases the chances of a deadlock occurring; especially in cases where another set of data modification instructions, dependent on the ones which are waiting for the reporting to finish has already been applied. Therefore, reporting can cause performance degradation in a production environment. So, how can reporting be optimized to prevent such a heavy load on production databases?April 4, 2013
Nobody likes to read a wall of text, even when it’s just plain text. When it comes to reading code, the problem is even bigger. Code can have different formatting styles, which could make your job either easier or more difficult. It can make code difficult to decipher and understand. A clean and neat SQL is read faster than an inconsistently written SQL; SQL reviewing and troubleshooting is more efficient; joint development efforts are more effective; handing off projects from one team to another is smoother.
How to make your SQL readable so that it is enough just to skim through the code and get the general idea
It’s the SQL formatting that makes the difference.April 4, 2013
Determining just the right primary key for tables is one of the most important parts of a robust, high-quality database design. The key candidates and the keys themselves need to be picked with caution, as suboptimal choices can snowball out of control and leave the bloated, slow databases which require heavy maintenance and require massive amounts of work to meet changes in the business requirements. Therefore, due to the importance of the primary keys for the future behavior of the database, their impact on the database performance needs to be weighted as well. So, from a performance standpoint, should replacing complex natural keys with a surrogate key be considered?April 4, 2013
In most cases, splitting a table into two tables containing different columns is required in order to address database design changes, business requirements or even adding domain restrictions retroactively (for example, isolating currencies in a separate table and enforcing referential integrity via a foreign key to ensure that only valid currencies can be stored in the database). However, splitting tables may actually offer additional performance benefits to the database.April 4, 2013
Database performance is a challenge for every developer and DBA. Even when some improvements are made, there is always a question – is there anything else that can be done.
There might be. Some of the performance improvement techniques are not code related – a proper indexing strategy, adding memory, using different disks for data files, log files, and database backups, using faster disks, optimizing tempdb performance.April 4, 2013
Changing the parameters of a SQL function or a stored procedure is easy – simply ALTER the function or the procedure and add or remove parameters, change the names or data types of the existing parameters and even set default parameter values. However, changing a parameter safely, in most cases, is anything but easyApril 4, 2013
Auditing a database is the first step towards staying updated about database changes. However, if specific, highly sensitive data needs reviewing, an immediate notification of any change is preferable.
Sending email alerts to one or more recipients is one of the most common ways of immediate notification. Sending emails for every change in a database is not advised. It will, in most cases, quickly fill your inbox, and add many unnecessary actions, which can also affect the overall application performance. Therefore, it is important to choose the changes that you want to be alerted about, carefully.April 4, 2013
If you’ve accidentally executed a DROP statement and you have a full database backup, given that no changes occurred after the table was dropped, you can simply recover the data by overwriting the original database with the backup. However, if that’s not the case, either because the database objects and data have been changed after the DROP SQL statement was executed or because you don’t have a valid database backup, there is still a way to recover all of your lost dataApril 4, 2013
How to recover a SQL Server database using an old backup and the current transaction log file DBAs have various disaster recovery plans. One of the questions they have to answer before setting up a right plan is how much data can they afford to lose. Many of “accidental DBAs” become aware that making regular full database backups might not be enough, only after it’s too late.April 4, 2013
If you’ve accidentally executed a TRUNCATE statement and you have a full database backup, given that no changes occurred after the table was truncated, you can simply recover the data by overwriting the original database with the backup. However, if that’s not the case, either because the database objects and data have been changed after the TRUNCATE SQL statement was executed or because you don’t have a valid database backup, there is still a way to recover all of your lost data.April 4, 2013